1.概述

转载：Flink 源码之时间处理

2.Flink支持的时间类型

• EventTime： 每条数据都携带时间戳。Operator处理数据的时候所有依赖时间的操作依据数据携带的时间戳。可以支持乱序数据的处理。时间戳信息可以在数据源产生数据的时候指定（SourceFunction的中调用context的collectWithTimestamp收集元素），也可以使用DataStream的assignTimestampsAndWatermarks指定。通常来说在每条数据中会有一个字段存储时间戳信息。
• ProcessingTime： 数据不携带任何时间戳的信息。operator使用系统当前时间作为每一条数据的处理时间。如果数据存在乱序的情况，Flink无法察觉。ProcessingTime为系统的默认值。
• IngestionTime： 和EventTime 类似，不同的是Flink会使用系统时间作为timestamp绑定到每条数据（数据进入Flink系统的时候使用系统当前时间为时间戳绑定数据）。可以防止Flink内部处理数据是发生乱序的情况。但无法解决数据到达Flink之前发生的乱序问题。如果需要处理此类问题，建议使用EventTime。

3.设置Flink系统使用的时间类型

使用Environment的setStreamTimeCharacteristic方法指定系统使用的时间类型。方法参数为TimeCharacteristic。

TimeCharacteristic为枚举类型，定义如下。

@PublicEvolving
public enum TimeCharacteristic {
    ProcessingTime,
    IngestionTime,
    EventTime
}

和之前所说的时间类型一一对应。

StreamExecutionEnvironment的setStreamTimeCharacteristic方法源码如下：

@PublicEvolving
public void setStreamTimeCharacteristic(TimeCharacteristic characteristic) {
    this.timeCharacteristic = Preconditions.checkNotNull(characteristic);
    if (characteristic == TimeCharacteristic.ProcessingTime) {
        getConfig().setAutoWatermarkInterval(0);
    } else {
        getConfig().setAutoWatermarkInterval(200);
    }
}

这里我们发现如果系统TimeCharacteristic为EventTime或者IngestionTime，会设置一个默认的自动watermark间隔时间（auto watermark interval）。这个参数是用来对齐集群中所有机器的watermark的。所有发送到下游的watermark一定是auto watermark interval的整数倍（通过源码分析发现该配置仅对IngestionTime生效）。具体逻辑在下文StreamSourceContexts部分分析。

4.StreamSourceContexts

StreamSourceContexts类负责根据系统的TimeCharacteristic来决定生成哪种类型的SourceContext。SourceContext在SourceFunction使用(参见 Flink 使用之数据源)，不同的SourceContext对数据timestamp处理的行为不同。

SourceFunction中使用的SourceContext由getSourceContext方法决定。

getSourceContext方法的调用链如下所示：

• SourceStreamTask中的LegacySourceFunctionThread.run: headOperator.run(getCheckpointLock(), getStreamStatusMaintainer(), operatorChain); 在这一行代码中传入了StreamStatusMaintainer。可以追溯到StreamTask的getStreamStatusMaintainer方法，返回的是一个OperatorChain。
• StreamSource.run: this.ctx = StreamSourceContexts.getSourceContext

getSourceContext方法的源码如下：

public static <OUT> SourceFunction.SourceContext<OUT> getSourceContext(
        TimeCharacteristic timeCharacteristic,
        ProcessingTimeService processingTimeService,
        Object checkpointLock,
        StreamStatusMaintainer streamStatusMaintainer,
        Output<StreamRecord<OUT>> output,
        long watermarkInterval,
        long idleTimeout) {

    final SourceFunction.SourceContext<OUT> ctx;
    switch (timeCharacteristic) {
        case EventTime:
            ctx = new ManualWatermarkContext<>(
                output,
                processingTimeService,
                checkpointLock,
                streamStatusMaintainer,
                idleTimeout);

            break;
        case IngestionTime:
            ctx = new AutomaticWatermarkContext<>(
                output,
                watermarkInterval,
                processingTimeService,
                checkpointLock,
                streamStatusMaintainer,
                idleTimeout);

            break;
        case ProcessingTime:
            ctx = new NonTimestampContext<>(checkpointLock, output);
            break;
        default:
            throw new IllegalArgumentException(String.valueOf(timeCharacteristic));
    }
    return ctx;
}

从源码可以看出，SourceContext有三种：

• EventTime使用ManualWatermarkContext
• ProcessingTime使用NonTimestampContext
• IngestionTime使用AutomaticWatermarkContext

其中ManualWatermarkContext和AutomaticWatermarkContext具有相同的父类WatermarkContext。

下面逐个分析WatermarkContext的方法。

4.1 WatermarkContext类

 @Override
        public void collect(T element) {
            // 防止和checkpoint操作同时进行
            synchronized (checkpointLock) {
                // 改变stream的状态为ACTIVE状态
                streamStatusMaintainer.toggleStreamStatus(StreamStatus.ACTIVE);

                if (nextCheck != null) {
                    // failOnNextCheck：如果下一个空闲检查已被安排，需要设置为true。当元素被collect之后，需要设置该变量为false。
                    this.failOnNextCheck = false;
                } else {
                    scheduleNextIdleDetectionTask();
                }

                processAndCollect(element);
            }
        }

WatermarkContext的streamStatusMaintainer只有一个实现类OperatorChain。该变量由StreamTask的operatorChain传入。

nextCheck为ScheduledFuture类型。

failOnNextCheck：如果下一个空闲检查已被安排，需要设置为true。当元素被collect之后，需要设置该变量为false。

如果没有安排下一次空闲检查，需要调用scheduleNextIdleDetectionTask。代码稍后分析。

最后调用processAndCollect方法，包含具体的处理和收集数据的逻辑。该方法为抽象方法，稍后分析。

scheduleNextIdleDetectionTask代码如下：

private void scheduleNextIdleDetectionTask() {
    if (idleTimeout != -1) {
        // reset flag; if it remains true when task fires, we have detected idleness
        failOnNextCheck = true;
        // 安排一个空闲检测任务。该任务在idleTimeout之后执行
        // getCurrentProcessingTime()返回的是系统当前时间
        nextCheck = this.timeService.registerTimer(
            this.timeService.getCurrentProcessingTime() + idleTimeout,
            new IdlenessDetectionTask());
    }
}

IdlenessDetectionTask的源码如下：

private class IdlenessDetectionTask implements ProcessingTimeCallback {
    @Override
    public void onProcessingTime(long timestamp) throws Exception {
        synchronized (checkpointLock) {
            // set this to null now;
            // the next idleness detection will be scheduled again
            // depending on the below failOnNextCheck condition
            // 设置nextCheck为null
            // 这样下次调用collect方法的时候会再次安排一个空闲检测任务
            nextCheck = null;

            if (failOnNextCheck) {
                // 标记数据源为空闲
                markAsTemporarilyIdle();
            } else {
                // 再次安排一个空闲检测任务
                scheduleNextIdleDetectionTask();
            }
        }
    }
}

markAsTemporarilyIdle方法：

@Override
public void markAsTemporarilyIdle() {
    synchronized (checkpointLock) {
        // 设置operatorChain的状态为空闲
        streamStatusMaintainer.toggleStreamStatus(StreamStatus.IDLE);
    }
}

经过以上分析我们不难发现collect方法具有自动空闲检测的功能。数据被收集的时候会设置stream为active状态，并设置一个空闲检查任务。该任务会在idleTimeout时间之后触发。如果在此期间内，仍没有数据被数据源采集，该数据源会被标记为空闲。如果期间内有数据到来，failOnNextCheck会被设置为false。此时空闲检测任务执行之后便不会标记数据源为空闲状态，取而代之的是再次安排一个空闲检测任务。

collectWithTimestamp方法在收集元素的同时，为元素绑定时间戳。代码如下：

@Override
public void collectWithTimestamp(T element, long timestamp) {
    synchronized (checkpointLock) {
        streamStatusMaintainer.toggleStreamStatus(StreamStatus.ACTIVE);

        if (nextCheck != null) {
            this.failOnNextCheck = false;
        } else {
            scheduleNextIdleDetectionTask();
        }

        processAndCollectWithTimestamp(element, timestamp);
    }
}

这段方法和collect方法的逻辑完全一致。同样具有定期检测数据源是否闲置的功能。在方法最后调用了子类的processAndCollectWithTimestamp方法。

emitWatermark方法用于向下游发送watermark。代码如下：

@Override
public void emitWatermark(Watermark mark) {
    // 此处多了一个判断，在允许使用watermark的情形下才会调用
    if (allowWatermark(mark)) {
        synchronized (checkpointLock) {
            streamStatusMaintainer.toggleStreamStatus(StreamStatus.ACTIVE);

            if (nextCheck != null) {
                this.failOnNextCheck = false;
            } else {
                scheduleNextIdleDetectionTask();
            }

            processAndEmitWatermark(mark);
        }
    }
}

此方法的逻辑和collect方法逻辑基本一致，不再赘述。

close方法用于关闭SourceContext，该方法会取消下一次空闲检测任务。代码如下：

@Override
public void close() {
    cancelNextIdleDetectionTask();
}

4.2 ManualWatermarkContext 类

EventTime时间类型使用的是ManualWatermarkContext。ManualWatermarkContext相比父类多了两个成员变量：

• output: 负责输出数据流中的元素。对于StreamSource而言output为AbstractStreamOperator$CountingOutput包装的RecordWriterOutput
• reuse：数据流中一个元素的包装类。该类在此被复用，不必反复创建。

ManualWatermarkContext实现父类的方法如下：

@Override
protected void processAndCollect(T element) {
    output.collect(reuse.replace(element));
}

@Override
protected void processAndCollectWithTimestamp(T element, long timestamp) {
    output.collect(reuse.replace(element, timestamp));
}

@Override
protected void processAndEmitWatermark(Watermark mark) {
    output.emitWatermark(mark);
}

@Override
protected boolean allowWatermark(Watermark mark) {
    // 永远允许发送watermark，所以返回true
    return true;
}

4.3 AutomaticWatermarkContext 类

IngestionTime时间类型使用的是AutomaticWatermarkContext。
此类的构造方法如下：

private AutomaticWatermarkContext(
        final Output<StreamRecord<T>> output,
        final long watermarkInterval,
        final ProcessingTimeService timeService,
        final Object checkpointLock,
        final StreamStatusMaintainer streamStatusMaintainer,
        final long idleTimeout) {

    super(timeService, checkpointLock, streamStatusMaintainer, idleTimeout);

    this.output = Preconditions.checkNotNull(output, "The output cannot be null.");

    Preconditions.checkArgument(watermarkInterval >= 1L, "The watermark interval cannot be smaller than 1 ms.");

    // 通过 auto watermark interval配置
    this.watermarkInterval = watermarkInterval;

    this.reuse = new StreamRecord<>(null);

    this.lastRecordTime = Long.MIN_VALUE;

    // 获取系统当前时间
    long now = this.timeService.getCurrentProcessingTime();
    // 设置一个watermark发送定时器，在watermarkInterval时间之后触发
    this.nextWatermarkTimer = this.timeService.registerTimer(now + watermarkInterval,
        new WatermarkEmittingTask(this.timeService, checkpointLock, output));
}

WatermarkEmittingTask主要代码逻辑如下：

@Override
public void onProcessingTime(long timestamp) {
    // 获取系统当前时间
    final long currentTime = timeService.getCurrentProcessingTime();

    // 加锁，不能和checkpoint操作同时运行
    synchronized (lock) {
        // we should continue to automatically emit watermarks if we are active
        // 需要OperatorChain的状态为ACTIVE
        if (streamStatusMaintainer.getStreamStatus().isActive()) {
            // idleTimeout 不等于-1意味着设置了数据源的空闲超时时间
            // 发送watermark的时候也检查数据源空闲时间
            if (idleTimeout != -1 && currentTime - lastRecordTime > idleTimeout) {
                // if we are configured to detect idleness, piggy-back the idle detection check on the
                // watermark interval, so that we may possibly discover idle sources faster before waiting
                // for the next idle check to fire
                markAsTemporarilyIdle();

                // no need to finish the next check, as we are now idle.
                cancelNextIdleDetectionTask();
            } else if (currentTime > nextWatermarkTime) {
                // align the watermarks across all machines. this will ensure that we
                // don't have watermarks that creep along at different intervals because
                // the machine clocks are out of sync
                // 取watermarkTime 为最接近currentTime 的watermarkInterval整数倍
                // 这称为watermark对齐操作，因为集群机器的时间是不同步的
                final long watermarkTime = currentTime - (currentTime % watermarkInterval);
                // 发送watermark
                output.emitWatermark(new Watermark(watermarkTime));
                // 设置下次发送的watermark的时间，注意和下次执行发送watermark任务的时间不同
                nextWatermarkTime = watermarkTime + watermarkInterval;
            }
        }
    }

    // 再次安排一个watermark发送任务
    long nextWatermark = currentTime + watermarkInterval;
    nextWatermarkTimer = this.timeService.registerTimer(
            nextWatermark, new WatermarkEmittingTask(this.timeService, lock, output));
}

通过以上分析我们不难发现AutomaticWatermarkContext是自动定时发送watermark到下游的。发送的间隔为watermarkInterval。

processAndCollect方法和逻辑如下所示：

@Override
protected void processAndCollect(T element) {
    lastRecordTime = this.timeService.getCurrentProcessingTime();
    output.collect(reuse.replace(element, lastRecordTime));

    // this is to avoid lock contention in the lockingObject by
    // sending the watermark before the firing of the watermark
    // emission task.
    // lastRecordTime如果大于nextWatermarkTime需要立即发送一次watermark
    // nextWatermarkTime为下次要发送的watermark的时间，和下次执行发送watermark任务的时间不同
    // 发送的watermark的时间一定比执行发送watermark任务的时间早
    // 如果没有此判断，到下次发送watermark任务执行之后，发送的watermark时间会早于这条数据的时间，下游不会及时处理这条数据。
    if (lastRecordTime > nextWatermarkTime) {
        // in case we jumped some watermarks, recompute the next watermark time
        final long watermarkTime = lastRecordTime - (lastRecordTime % watermarkInterval);
        // nextWatermarkTime比lastRecordTime大
        // 因此下游会立即开始处理这条数据
        nextWatermarkTime = watermarkTime + watermarkInterval;
        output.emitWatermark(new Watermark(watermarkTime));

        // we do not need to register another timer here
        // because the emitting task will do so.
    }
}

processAndCollectWithTimestamp方法如下所示。第二个参数timestamp被忽略。IngestionTime使用系统时间作为元素绑定时间。

@Override
protected void processAndCollectWithTimestamp(T element, long timestamp) {
    processAndCollect(element);
}

最后我们分析下allowWatermark和processAndEmitWatermark方法。AutomaticWatermarkContext不允许我们显式要求发送watermark。只能通过定时任务发送。只有当waterMark时间为Long.MAX_VALUE并且nextWatermarkTime不为Long.MAX_VALUE才可以发送。发送过这个特殊的watermark之后，关闭定时发送watermark的任务。代码如下所示：

@Override
protected boolean allowWatermark(Watermark mark) {
    // allow Long.MAX_VALUE since this is the special end-watermark that for example the Kafka source emits
    return mark.getTimestamp() == Long.MAX_VALUE && nextWatermarkTime != Long.MAX_VALUE;
}

/** This will only be called if allowWatermark returned {@code true}. */
@Override
protected void processAndEmitWatermark(Watermark mark) {
    nextWatermarkTime = Long.MAX_VALUE;
    output.emitWatermark(mark);

    // we can shutdown the watermark timer now, no watermarks will be needed any more.
    // Note that this procedure actually doesn't need to be synchronized with the lock,
    // but since it's only a one-time thing, doesn't hurt either
    final ScheduledFuture<?> nextWatermarkTimer = this.nextWatermarkTimer;
    if (nextWatermarkTimer != null) {
        nextWatermarkTimer.cancel(true);
    }
}

4.4 NonTimestampContext 类

这个类比较简单，不处理任何和timestamp相关的逻辑。也不会发送任何watermark。在此不做过多的分析。

5 ProcessingTime 调用链

InternalTimeServiceImpl.registerProcessingTimeTimer
SystemProcessingTimeService.registerTimer
SystemProcessingTimeService.wrapOnTimerCallback
ScheduledTask.run
TimerInvocationContext.invoke
InternalTimeServiceImpl.onProcessingTime(): triggerTarget.onProcessingTime(timer);

4.5.1 InternalTimeServiceImpl.registerProcessingTimeTimer

registerProcessingTimeTimer方法注册一个ProcessingTime定时器：

@Override
// 该方法主要在windowOperator和SimpleTimerService中调用
// 在windowOperator调用，namespace传入当前window
// 在SimpleTimerService调用，namespace传入VoidNamespace.INSTANCE
public void registerProcessingTimeTimer(N namespace, long time) {
    // 这是一个PriorityQueue。获取timestamp最小的timer
    InternalTimer<K, N> oldHead = processingTimeTimersQueue.peek();
    // 如果新加入的timer的timestamp是最小的，方法返回true
    if (processingTimeTimersQueue.add(new TimerHeapInternalTimer<>(time, (K) keyContext.getCurrentKey(), namespace))) {
        long nextTriggerTime = oldHead != null ? oldHead.getTimestamp() : Long.MAX_VALUE;
        // check if we need to re-schedule our timer to earlier
        // 如果新加入的timer的timetstamp在队列中最小（最先执行）
        // 需要取消掉原有的timer
        // 再重新注册timer，timestamp为新加入timer的timetstamp
        if (time < nextTriggerTime) {
            if (nextTimer != null) {
                nextTimer.cancel(false);
            }
            nextTimer = processingTimeService.registerTimer(time, this);
        }
    }
}

InternalTimeServiceImpl维护了一个processingTimeTimersQueue变量。该变量是一个有序的队列，存储了一系列定时器对象。

InternalTimeServiceManager在获取InternalTimeServiceImpl会调用它的startTimerService方法。该方法会把第一个（时间最早的timer）注册到一个ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor上。因此第一个timer到时间的时候会调用InternalTimeServiceImpl的onProcessingTime方法。

InternalTimeServiceImpl的onProcessingTime方法代码如下：

@Override
public void onProcessingTime(long time) throws Exception {
    // null out the timer in case the Triggerable calls registerProcessingTimeTimer()
    // inside the callback.
    nextTimer = null;

    InternalTimer<K, N> timer;

    // 一直循环获取时间小于参数time的所有定时器，并运行triggerTarget的onProcessingTime方法
    // 例如WindowOperator中的internalTimerService，triggerTarget就是WindowOperator自身
    while ((timer = processingTimeTimersQueue.peek()) != null && timer.getTimestamp() <= time) {
        processingTimeTimersQueue.poll();
        keyContext.setCurrentKey(timer.getKey());
        triggerTarget.onProcessingTime(timer);
    }

    // 执行到这一步的时候timer的timetamp刚好大于参数time
    // 此时在安排下一个定时器
    if (timer != null && nextTimer == null) {
        nextTimer = processingTimeService.registerTimer(timer.getTimestamp(), this);
    }
}

由以上分析可知processingTimeTimersQueue的timer中，始终会有一个timestamp最小的timer被注册为定时任务。每次触发定时器总会有一个timestamp刚好大于该定时器timestamp的定时器（来自processingTimeTimersQueue）被安排定时执行。

4.5.2 SystemProcessingTimeService.registerTimer

上部分 InternalTimeServiceImpl.registerProcessingTimeTimer会调用
SystemProcessingTimeService.registerTimer方法。其源代码如下：

@Override
public ScheduledFuture<?> registerTimer(long timestamp, ProcessingTimeCallback callback) {

    // delay the firing of the timer by 1 ms to align the semantics with watermark. A watermark
    // T says we won't see elements in the future with a timestamp smaller or equal to T.
    // With processing time, we therefore need to delay firing the timer by one ms.
    // 此处计算delay的值
    // 依照英文注释所言，这里额外延迟1ms触发是要和watermark的语义一致
    long delay = Math.max(timestamp - getCurrentProcessingTime(), 0) + 1;

    // we directly try to register the timer and only react to the status on exception
    // that way we save unnecessary volatile accesses for each timer
    try {
        // 这里schedule一个timer
        // wrapOnTimerCallback返回一个ScheduledTask对象
        // ScheduledTask对象封装了定时timestamp和定时执行的任务逻辑
        return timerService.schedule(wrapOnTimerCallback(callback, timestamp), delay, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
    }
    catch (RejectedExecutionException e) {
        final int status = this.status.get();
        if (status == STATUS_QUIESCED) {
            return new NeverCompleteFuture(delay);
        }
        else if (status == STATUS_SHUTDOWN) {
            throw new IllegalStateException("Timer service is shut down");
        }
        else {
            // something else happened, so propagate the exception
            throw e;
        }
    }
}

4.5.3 InternalTimeServiceImpl创建逻辑

一个Operator持有一个InternalTimeServiceImpl实例。调用链如下：

• AbstractStreamOperator.getInternalTimerService
• InternalTimeServiceManager.registerOrGetTimerService
  另外，SystemProcessingTimeService在StreamTask的invoke方法中创建。

6.EventTime 调用逻辑

各个Task接收watermark到响应watermark事件的调用链如下：

StreamTaskNetworkInput.processElement
StatusWatermarkValve.inputWatermark
StatusWatermarkValve.findAndOutputNewMinWatermarkAcrossAlignedChannels
OneInputStreamTask.emitWatermark
AbstractStreamOperator.processWatermark
InternalTimeServiceManager.advanceWatermark
InternalTimeServiceImpl.advanceWatermark: triggerTarget.onEventTime(timer);

以windowOperator为例。如果系统的TimeCharacteristic设置的是EventTime，每次元素到来之后都会注册一个EventTime定时器，时间为window结束时间。

6.1 InternalTimeServiceImpl.registerEventTimeTimer

@Override
public void registerEventTimeTimer(N namespace, long time) {
    eventTimeTimersQueue.add(new TimerHeapInternalTimer<>(time, (K) keyContext.getCurrentKey(), namespace));
}

注册一个EventTime定时器就是在eventTimeTimersQueue中添加一个timer。eventTimeTimersQueue和processingTimeTimersQueue结构完全一样。只不过是用于专门存放EventTime的定时器。下面的问题就是什么时候Flink会使用这些timer触发计算呢？

6.2 InternalTimeServiceImpl.advanceWatermark

这个方法在接收到watermark的时候调用。主要逻辑为从eventTimeTimersQueue中依次取出触发时间小于参数time的所有定时器，调用triggerTarget.onEventTime方法。triggerTarget.onEventTime含有operator基于eventTime计算的具体逻辑。

advanceWatermark方法代码如下：

public void advanceWatermark(long time) throws Exception {
    currentWatermark = time;

    InternalTimer<K, N> timer;

    while ((timer = eventTimeTimersQueue.peek()) != null && timer.getTimestamp() <= time) {
        eventTimeTimersQueue.poll();
        keyContext.setCurrentKey(timer.getKey());
        triggerTarget.onEventTime(timer);
    }
}

上面的方法在InternalTimeServiceManager中调用。InternalTimeServiceManager的advanceWatermark方法循环调用内部所有InternalTimerService的advanceWatermark方法。

public void advanceWatermark(Watermark watermark) throws Exception {
    for (InternalTimerServiceImpl<?, ?> service : timerServices.values()) {
        service.advanceWatermark(watermark.getTimestamp());
    }
}

该方法的调用在AbstractStreamOperator的processWatermark中，代码如下：

public void processWatermark(Watermark mark) throws Exception {
    if (timeServiceManager != null) {
        timeServiceManager.advanceWatermark(mark);
    }
    // 向下游继续发送watermark
    output.emitWatermark(mark);
}

按照调用链，我们继续跟踪到OneInputStreamTask的emitWatermark方法：

@Override
public void emitWatermark(Watermark watermark) throws Exception {
    synchronized (lock) {
        watermarkGauge.setCurrentWatermark(watermark.getTimestamp());
        operator.processWatermark(watermark);
    }
}

接下来是StatusWatermarkValve的findAndOutputNewMinWatermarkAcrossAlignedChannels方法：

private void findAndOutputNewMinWatermarkAcrossAlignedChannels() throws Exception {
    long newMinWatermark = Long.MAX_VALUE;
    boolean hasAlignedChannels = false;

    // determine new overall watermark by considering only watermark-aligned channels across all channels
    for (InputChannelStatus channelStatus : channelStatuses) {
        // 阅读inputStreamStatus方法可知input channel变为空闲状态的时候watermark对齐状态为false
        // 获取所有对齐状态channel的watermark最小值
        if (channelStatus.isWatermarkAligned) {
            hasAlignedChannels = true;
            newMinWatermark = Math.min(channelStatus.watermark, newMinWatermark);
        }
    }

    // we acknowledge and output the new overall watermark if it really is aggregated
    // from some remaining aligned channel, and is also larger than the last output watermark
    // 发送watermark
    if (hasAlignedChannels && newMinWatermark > lastOutputWatermark) {
        lastOutputWatermark = newMinWatermark;
        output.emitWatermark(new Watermark(lastOutputWatermark));
    }
}

接下来分析inputWatermark方法：

public void inputWatermark(Watermark watermark, int channelIndex) throws Exception {
    // ignore the input watermark if its input channel, or all input channels are idle (i.e. overall the valve is idle).
    if (lastOutputStreamStatus.isActive() && channelStatuses[channelIndex].streamStatus.isActive()) {
        long watermarkMillis = watermark.getTimestamp();

        // if the input watermark's value is less than the last received watermark for its input channel, ignore it also.
        if (watermarkMillis > channelStatuses[channelIndex].watermark) {
            // 更新channel的watermark
            channelStatuses[channelIndex].watermark = watermarkMillis;

            // previously unaligned input channels are now aligned if its watermark has caught up
            // 设置channel的watermark对齐状态为true
            // 该channel之前是空闲状态，且watermark已被更新，因此这里设置其对齐状态为true
            if (!channelStatuses[channelIndex].isWatermarkAligned && watermarkMillis >= lastOutputWatermark) {
                channelStatuses[channelIndex].isWatermarkAligned = true;
            }

            // now, attempt to find a new min watermark across all aligned channels
            // 调用上个代码片段的方法
            findAndOutputNewMinWatermarkAcrossAlignedChannels();
        }
    }
}

最后我们跟踪到调用inputWatermark方法的位置在StreamTaskNetworkInput的processElement方法：

private void processElement(StreamElement recordOrMark, DataOutput<T> output) throws Exception {
    if (recordOrMark.isRecord()){
        output.emitRecord(recordOrMark.asRecord());
    } else if (recordOrMark.isWatermark()) {
        statusWatermarkValve.inputWatermark(recordOrMark.asWatermark(), lastChannel);
    } else if (recordOrMark.isLatencyMarker()) {
        output.emitLatencyMarker(recordOrMark.asLatencyMarker());
    } else if (recordOrMark.isStreamStatus()) {
        statusWatermarkValve.inputStreamStatus(recordOrMark.asStreamStatus(), lastChannel);
    } else {
        throw new UnsupportedOperationException("Unknown type of StreamElement");
    }
}

很明显，该方法判断接收到元素的类型调用对应的处理逻辑。再向上跟踪就是Task之间传递数据的逻辑，会在后续博客中分析。

7.TimestampAssigner

经过上面的分析我们已经了解了operator是怎样的传递和响应接收到的watermark的。接下来还有一个地方需要研究，那就是watermark是怎样的产生的。

watermark可以在两个地方产生：

• 数据源调用emitWatermark方法。博客开头StreamSourceContexts部分已经分析了源码。此处不再赘述。
• 调用DataStream的assignTimestampsAndWatermarks方法。

assignTimestampsAndWatermarks有两个版本，一个接收AssignerWithPeriodicWatermarks另一个是AssignerWithPunctuatedWatermarks。我们先看源代码，稍后分析他们的不同之处。

AssignerWithPeriodicWatermarks版本的代码如下所示：

public SingleOutputStreamOperator<T> assignTimestampsAndWatermarks(
        AssignerWithPeriodicWatermarks<T> timestampAndWatermarkAssigner) {

    // match parallelism to input, otherwise dop=1 sources could lead to some strange
    // behaviour: the watermark will creep along very slowly because the elements
    // from the source go to each extraction operator round robin.
    final int inputParallelism = getTransformation().getParallelism();
    final AssignerWithPeriodicWatermarks<T> cleanedAssigner = clean(timestampAndWatermarkAssigner);

    TimestampsAndPeriodicWatermarksOperator<T> operator =
            new TimestampsAndPeriodicWatermarksOperator<>(cleanedAssigner);

    return transform("Timestamps/Watermarks", getTransformation().getOutputType(), operator)
            .setParallelism(inputParallelism);
}

AssignerWithPunctuatedWatermarks版本的代码如下所示：

public SingleOutputStreamOperator<T> assignTimestampsAndWatermarks(
        AssignerWithPunctuatedWatermarks<T> timestampAndWatermarkAssigner) {

    // match parallelism to input, otherwise dop=1 sources could lead to some strange
    // behaviour: the watermark will creep along very slowly because the elements
    // from the source go to each extraction operator round robin.
    final int inputParallelism = getTransformation().getParallelism();
    final AssignerWithPunctuatedWatermarks<T> cleanedAssigner = clean(timestampAndWatermarkAssigner);

    TimestampsAndPunctuatedWatermarksOperator<T> operator =
            new TimestampsAndPunctuatedWatermarksOperator<>(cleanedAssigner);

    return transform("Timestamps/Watermarks", getTransformation().getOutputType(), operator)
            .setParallelism(inputParallelism);
}

这两个版本的代码基本一致，仅仅是使用的operator不同。

TimestampsAndPeriodicWatermarksOperator

首先我们分析下TimestampsAndPeriodicWatermarksOperator源码。如下所示：

public class TimestampsAndPeriodicWatermarksOperator<T>
        extends AbstractUdfStreamOperator<T, AssignerWithPeriodicWatermarks<T>>
        implements OneInputStreamOperator<T, T>, ProcessingTimeCallback {

    private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;

    private transient long watermarkInterval;

    private transient long currentWatermark;

    public TimestampsAndPeriodicWatermarksOperator(AssignerWithPeriodicWatermarks<T> assigner) {
        super(assigner);
        // 允许此operator和它前后的其他operator形成operator chain
        this.chainingStrategy = ChainingStrategy.ALWAYS;
    }

    @Override
    public void open() throws Exception {
        super.open();

        currentWatermark = Long.MIN_VALUE;
        // 获取env中配置的自动watermark触发间隔
        watermarkInterval = getExecutionConfig().getAutoWatermarkInterval();

        if (watermarkInterval > 0) {
            long now = getProcessingTimeService().getCurrentProcessingTime();
            // 注册一个processing time定时器，在watermarkInterval之后触发，调用本类的onProcessingTime方法
            getProcessingTimeService().registerTimer(now + watermarkInterval, this);
        }
    }

    @Override
    public void processElement(StreamRecord<T> element) throws Exception {
        // 调用用户传入的TimestampAssigner的extractTimestamp方法，获取timestamp
        final long newTimestamp = userFunction.extractTimestamp(element.getValue(),
                element.hasTimestamp() ? element.getTimestamp() : Long.MIN_VALUE);
        // 收集此元素和timestamp并发往下游
        output.collect(element.replace(element.getValue(), newTimestamp));
    }

    @Override
        // open方法中注册的定时器触发的时候执行此方法
    public void onProcessingTime(long timestamp) throws Exception {
        // register next timer
        // 调用用户传入的方法获取当前watermark
        Watermark newWatermark = userFunction.getCurrentWatermark();
        if (newWatermark != null && newWatermark.getTimestamp() > currentWatermark) {
            currentWatermark = newWatermark.getTimestamp();
            // emit watermark
            output.emitWatermark(newWatermark);
        }
        // 再次schedule一个processing time定时任务
        long now = getProcessingTimeService().getCurrentProcessingTime();
        getProcessingTimeService().registerTimer(now + watermarkInterval, this);
    }

    /**
     * Override the base implementation to completely ignore watermarks propagated from
     * upstream (we rely only on the {@link AssignerWithPeriodicWatermarks} to emit
     * watermarks from here).
     */
    // 忽略上游的所有watermark
    // 有一个例外就是上接收到timestamp为Long.MAX_VALUE的watermark
    // 此时意味着输入流已经结束，需要将这个watermark发往下游
    @Override
    public void processWatermark(Watermark mark) throws Exception {
        // if we receive a Long.MAX_VALUE watermark we forward it since it is used
        // to signal the end of input and to not block watermark progress downstream
        if (mark.getTimestamp() == Long.MAX_VALUE && currentWatermark != Long.MAX_VALUE) {
            currentWatermark = Long.MAX_VALUE;
            output.emitWatermark(mark);
        }
    }

    @Override
    public void close() throws Exception {
        super.close();

        // emit a final watermark
        // operator关闭的时候再次出发一次watermark发送操作
        Watermark newWatermark = userFunction.getCurrentWatermark();
        if (newWatermark != null && newWatermark.getTimestamp() > currentWatermark) {
            currentWatermark = newWatermark.getTimestamp();
            // emit watermark
            output.emitWatermark(newWatermark);
        }
    }
}

TimestampsAndPunctuatedWatermarksOperator

该类的源码分析如下：

public class TimestampsAndPunctuatedWatermarksOperator<T>
        extends AbstractUdfStreamOperator<T, AssignerWithPunctuatedWatermarks<T>>
        implements OneInputStreamOperator<T, T> {

    private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;

    private long currentWatermark = Long.MIN_VALUE;

    public TimestampsAndPunctuatedWatermarksOperator(AssignerWithPunctuatedWatermarks<T> assigner) {
        super(assigner);
        this.chainingStrategy = ChainingStrategy.ALWAYS;
    }

    @Override
    public void processElement(StreamRecord<T> element) throws Exception {
        final T value = element.getValue();
                // 调用用户方法获取timestamp
        final long newTimestamp = userFunction.extractTimestamp(value,
                element.hasTimestamp() ? element.getTimestamp() : Long.MIN_VALUE);
                // 收集元素
        output.collect(element.replace(element.getValue(), newTimestamp));

                // 调用用户方法获取watermark，发送给下游
        final Watermark nextWatermark = userFunction.checkAndGetNextWatermark(value, newTimestamp);
        if (nextWatermark != null && nextWatermark.getTimestamp() > currentWatermark) {
            currentWatermark = nextWatermark.getTimestamp();
            output.emitWatermark(nextWatermark);
        }
    }

    /**
     * Override the base implementation to completely ignore watermarks propagated from
     * upstream (we rely only on the {@link AssignerWithPunctuatedWatermarks} to emit
     * watermarks from here).
     */
        // 和TimestampsAndPeriodicWatermarksOperator的方法一样，不再赘述
    @Override
    public void processWatermark(Watermark mark) throws Exception {
        // if we receive a Long.MAX_VALUE watermark we forward it since it is used
        // to signal the end of input and to not block watermark progress downstream
        if (mark.getTimestamp() == Long.MAX_VALUE && currentWatermark != Long.MAX_VALUE) {
            currentWatermark = Long.MAX_VALUE;
            output.emitWatermark(mark);
        }
    }
}

经过分析可知这两个operator最大的区别是TimestampsAndPeriodicWatermarksOperator会周期性的发送watermark，即便没有数据，仍会周期性发送timestamp相同的watermark，而TimestampsAndPunctuatedWatermarksOperator不会周期性发送watermark，只在每次元素到来的时候才发送watermark。

8.AscendingTimestampExtractor

这个timestamp提取器适用于顺序到来元素携带的timestamp严格递增的场景。

以下是extractTimestamp方法的源代码。该方法多了一个判断逻辑。如果新元素提取出的timestamp比currentTimestamp小的话，说明timestamp没有严格递增。接下来violationHandler的handleViolation会被调用。handleViolation是timestamp没有严格递增时候的回调函数。用户可以自己实现回调函数，也可以使用系统实现好的两个回调，分别是：

• IgnoringHandler：忽略没有严格递增的情况，不作任何处理。
• FailingHandler：抛出RuntimeException。
• LoggingHandler：使用日志记录。

@Override
public final long extractTimestamp(T element, long elementPrevTimestamp) {
    final long newTimestamp = extractAscendingTimestamp(element);
    if (newTimestamp >= this.currentTimestamp) {
        this.currentTimestamp = newTimestamp;
        return newTimestamp;
    } else {
        violationHandler.handleViolation(newTimestamp, this.currentTimestamp);
        return newTimestamp;
    }
}

BoundedOutOfOrdernessTimestampExtractor

watermark最常用的场景就是允许一定程度的数据乱序（有一个来迟数据的最大允许容忍时间，超过这个时间的数据不会被计算，由旁路输出处理）。Flink根据这种场景为我们实现好了一个timestamp提取器。该提取器中有一个重要变量maxOutOfOrderness，含义为上句话括号中所述的数据来迟最大容忍时间。该提取器是一个抽象类，使用时需要用户继承此类，实现extractTimestamp(T element)方法，编写根据元素来获取timestamp的逻辑。

该提取器的extractTimestamp(T element, long previousElementTimestamp)方法和分析如下所示：

@Override
public final long extractTimestamp(T element, long previousElementTimestamp) {
    // 调用用户实现的方法，从元素获取timestamp
    long timestamp = extractTimestamp(element);
    // currentMaxTimestamp存储了已处理数据最大的timestamp
    // 初始值为Long.MIN_VALUE + maxOutOfOrderness
    if (timestamp > currentMaxTimestamp) {
        currentMaxTimestamp = timestamp;
    }
    return timestamp;
}

此方法由之前所讲的两个operator调用。用户不需要考虑如何实现这个方法，只需要实现该方法间接调用的extractTimestamp(T element)方法即可。

getCurrentWatermark获取当前watermark方法代码如下：

@Override
public final Watermark getCurrentWatermark() {
    // this guarantees that the watermark never goes backwards.
    // 主要逻辑在此，发送watermark的时间为减去maxOutOfOrderness
    // 含义为maxOutOfOrderness时间之前的数据已经到齐
    // 这样保证了只有maxOutOfOrderness时间之前的数据才进行计算
    long potentialWM = currentMaxTimestamp - maxOutOfOrderness;
    // 此处防止watermark倒流
    if (potentialWM >= lastEmittedWatermark) {
        lastEmittedWatermark = potentialWM;
    }
    return new Watermark(lastEmittedWatermark);
}

IngestionTimeExtractor

和AutomaticWatermarkContext生成watermark的逻辑基本一致，只是没有watermark对齐操作。使用系统当前时间作为watermark的timestamp发往下游。

public class IngestionTimeExtractor<T> implements AssignerWithPeriodicWatermarks<T> {
    private static final long serialVersionUID = -4072216356049069301L;

    private long maxTimestamp;

    @Override
    public long extractTimestamp(T element, long previousElementTimestamp) {
        // make sure timestamps are monotonously increasing, even when the system clock re-syncs
        final long now = Math.max(System.currentTimeMillis(), maxTimestamp);
        maxTimestamp = now;
        return now;
    }

    @Override
    public Watermark getCurrentWatermark() {
        // make sure timestamps are monotonously increasing, even when the system clock re-syncs
        final long now = Math.max(System.currentTimeMillis(), maxTimestamp);
        maxTimestamp = now;
        return new Watermark(now - 1);
    }
}