之前做的通信框架,一直用的List<byte>做的数据接收池。今天有点闲暇时间,特地写了个DEMO将C#中的三种字节数组拼接方式的性能做了一个对比测试。
代码如下(若代码有不严谨或错误之处,恳请指出。):
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using System.Text; using System.Diagnostics; namespace BytesLinkDemo { class Program { static int RunCount = 10000; static void Main(string[] args) { ArrayCopyTest(); BlockCopyTest(); ListTest(); Console.ReadKey(); } static void ListTest() { List<byte> byteSource = new List<byte>(); byteSource.Add(11); Stopwatch sw = new Stopwatch(); sw.Start(); for (int i = 0; i < RunCount; i++) { byte[] newData = new byte[10] { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 }; byteSource.AddRange(newData); } byte[] data = byteSource.ToArray(); //byte[] subData = byteSource.Take(100).ToArray();//获取前100个字节 //byteSource.RemoveRange(0, 100);//取出后删除 //byteSource.GetRange(100, 100);//从下标100开始取100个字节 sw.Stop(); Console.WriteLine("ListTest " + sw.ElapsedMilliseconds + " 毫秒,数组长度:" + data.Length); } static void ArrayCopyTest() { byte[] byteSource = new byte[1] { 11 }; Stopwatch sw = new Stopwatch(); sw.Start(); for (int i = 0; i < RunCount; i++) { byte[] newData = new byte[10] { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 }; byte[] tmp = new byte[byteSource.Length + newData.Length]; Array.Copy(byteSource, tmp, byteSource.Length); Array.Copy(newData, 0, tmp, byteSource.Length, newData.Length); byteSource = tmp; } sw.Stop(); Console.WriteLine("ArrayCopyTest " + sw.ElapsedMilliseconds + " 毫秒,数组长度:" + byteSource.Length); } static void BlockCopyTest() { byte[] byteSource = new byte[1] { 11 }; Stopwatch sw = new Stopwatch(); sw.Start(); for (int i = 0; i < RunCount; i++) { byte[] newData = new byte[10] { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 }; byte[] tmp = new byte[byteSource.Length + newData.Length]; System.Buffer.BlockCopy(byteSource, 0, tmp, 0, byteSource.Length); System.Buffer.BlockCopy(newData, 0, tmp, byteSource.Length, newData.Length); byteSource = tmp; } sw.Stop(); Console.WriteLine("BlockCopyTest " + sw.ElapsedMilliseconds + " 毫秒,数组长度:" + byteSource.Length); } } }
测试结果: